The complete mediocracy of Liam

orvillepeckspocketpussy:

ALT

ALT

ALT

one thing i am quite grateful to Brian David Gilbert for is the phrase “If you needed ME to tell you that… I’m glad I told you that.”

it has been etched into my brain for the past six years, fundamentally altering how i consider knowledge gaps held by others, as well as myself. people usually need to be told stuff before they can know it! that’s how knowing stuff works! this is an extreme example played for laughs but it’s a legitimately helpful philosophy!!

esynk:

honeysider:

angelnumber27:

madenthusiasms:

my-midlife-crisis:

No children are allowed in the Library of Congress.

It’s not that kind of library.

In other words…

You are being lied to

again

Everything published in the US is copied to the Library of Congress; appropriateness for children is not a criteria. Published is under copyright is.

In order to read something in the Library of Congress, you must, in order:

1) Be 16+ years old and in possession of ID such as a driver’s license or passport to obtain a LoC card

2) Make an appointment to go to a reading room

3) Know what it is you want to read and which library building it is in so you can fill out a request form when you arrive.

So the chances of a “child” just stumbling over something “inappropriate” that was “put” there by the choice of the head librarian is 100% impossible.

Leavitt seems to believe that if she wears a big enough cross, God can’t hear her breaking the commandment against false witness.

definitely-not-a-plant:

kiddieplushie:

official-graveyard-posts:

magicalgirlbait:

irredeemablemonster:

irredeemablemonster:

it would kill half of this site to understand that kids start jerking off and looking at porn the moment they hit puberty and get any kind of sex drive.

w-what do you mean kids arent sexless and pure beings??? i-i thought sexual thoughts only appear when you’re 18…. or, no, 21……

i saw smth along the lines of “minors shouldn’t see porn, their brains are developing!!!”

this argument only makes sense if you

1. dont understand how any of human biology works

2. think of porn, depiction of the sexual act, as containing the primordial fucking sin, something that corrupts the minds of anyone looking at it

deeply fascist shit

i need people to understand the fact that the stigma surrounding being a child looking at porn was the very first step into terrifying me into being unable to speak about the sexual violence i endured, which in turn allowed for it to continue happening.

Official graveyard post

”official graveyard post” so i want to remind y’all this was posted like a month and half ago, i was magicalgirlbait. ive had 8 blogs since then. tumblr really really doesn’t like it when victims talk about their experiences

they really dont like it

evilvillain123456789:

the part of BDSM that is catholic isnt the part where you spank people and put them in cages it’s actually the elaborate social scaffold of consent and concensus which is an outpouring of scholastic liberal modernity and a continuation of the iconographic project (making mysteries explicit, thus corrupting them). stepping on trade’s dick can still be protestant. it can still be protestant

Say what you want about Dr. Frank-n-Furter, with the giant magnet, his castle is ADA compliant.

Anonymous asked:

Tumblr being the "piss on the poor" reading comprehension site makes sense when you realize that 79% of adults in the US are functionally illiterate. Same goes for Twitter and TikTok.

batmanisagatewaydrug:

batmanisagatewaydrug:

that’s a real high number, sport. where’d you get it?

hey anon

please tell me you didn’t google “US literacy rates” and then make the funniest possible mistake one could make in that situation

dragon-in-a-fez:

dragon-in-a-fez:

hipster cafes be like “we are proud to be a community establishment! 😊 think local!! 😇 everyone welcome!!! 🏳️‍🌈 restroom for customers only”

damn the leftism sure is leaving some people’s bodies in the notes

victusinveritas:

All of this is correct. No notes.